Board meeting
Area Plan CommissionAug 5, 2026
- Items on the agenda
- 10
Highlights
- Property
Area Plan Commission recommends splitting a Kent Avenue lot to add a duplex next to an existing sober-living home
Outcome: Recommended for approval on a voice vote; still needs a final vote from Terre Haute City Council.
0:04:18 — open the recording, cued to 4 minutes 18 seconds - Property
Area Plan Commission recommends rezoning the former Mason Lodge on Garfield Avenue for a software company's office
Outcome: Recommended for approval on a voice vote; still needs a final vote from Terre Haute City Council.
0:08:48 — open the recording, cued to 8 minutes 48 seconds - Property
Area Plan Commission approves splitting a 12.85-acre Fruitridge Avenue property, with a flood-map error to fix first
Outcome: Approved on a voice vote, conditioned on correcting the plat's flood-zone information.
0:14:07 — open the recording, cued to 14 minutes 7 seconds - Property
Area Plan Commission approves a 5-acre commercial subdivision on Wabash Avenue near Union Hospital
Outcome: Approved on a voice vote.
0:16:00 — open the recording, cued to 16 minutes - Deferral
Area Plan Commission takes no action on the 908 South 7th Street rezoning request
Outcome: No action taken; the request reached City Council without an Area Plan Commission recommendation.
0:07:13 — open the recording, cued to 7 minutes 13 seconds - Property
Area Plan Commission approves subdivision at the Mill on South Riverside Road after a recusal
Outcome: Approved on a voice vote after a recusal.
0:18:10 — open the recording, cued to 18 minutes 10 seconds
Documents
Transcript
Open the transcript on its own page
About this transcript
Automatic transcription, not the official record. This is what speech recognition heard at the meeting; it mis-hears names and numbers, and no editor has checked it. The clerk's minutes are the official record. Every line links to the moment in the recording — check anything that matters.
Voices were separated automatically and named from the meeting's speaker roster where the evidence supported it. An unnamed voice shows as Speaker 12 — a machine label, not a person's name.
- Meeting
- Area Plan Commission · Aug 5, 2026
- Length
- 0:21:00
- Lines
- 118
- Transcribed by
- mlx-community/whisper-large-v3-turbo
0:00:00 — open the recording at 0 secondsSpeaker 0 Yeah. We are live whenever you're right.
0:00:25 — open the recording at 25 secondsSpeaker 3 (chair (President)) I'll call the August meeting of the Area Planning Commission to order. can I have roll call please Paul Alsup
0:00:35 — open the recording at 35 secondsSpeaker 7 (clerk (reads roll call)) Brian Baker Kevin Beaver Deborah Carter Terry Clark Mark Flinkenbeard John Collett Norm Froederman Don Polk John Hanley Marcus Mauer Debbie May Amanda Thompson William Verdine we do have a quorum
0:00:57 — open the recording at 57 secondsSpeaker 3 (chair (President)) Could I ask everyone to stand for the Pledge of Allegiance, please? I assume everyone's had an opportunity to review the minutes from our previous meeting as well as our special meetings and the status report are there any comments questions or corrections on those second those in favor motion passes we don't have any public comments on non-agenda items scheduled tonight so
0:01:50 — open the recording at 1 minute 50 secondsSpeaker 28 (staff) executive directors report good evening I'll file an addendum to the committee report for the Randall Clark minor sub you may have noticed it's been on the agenda for a while now we don't know whether it's going to be concluded or not there were some stipulations that the Health Department attached to the approval of that and I don't know if the petitioner is willing to comply with those stipulations okay so at this time it is still pending it will remain pending until we hear otherwise okay so that's that I do want to take this opportunity
0:02:21 — open the recording at 2 minutes 21 secondsSpeaker 28 (staff) this evening to introduce our new administrative assistant Brittany Meyer Brittany comes to us from counseling pathways where she had been promoted to case manager, supervisor. She's also experienced with the Department of Child Services, where she managed scheduling appointments, meetings, reports, and presentations. Her experience from her past employment locations made her an excellent fit skill-wise with our open position. We're excited to have her joining our team and look forward to her sharing of her time and talents with our office.
0:02:45 — open the recording at 2 minutes 45 secondsSpeaker 31 The President, welcome.
0:02:50 — open the recording at 2 minutes 50 secondsSpeaker 32 Sidney.
0:02:52 — open the recording at 2 minutes 52 secondsSpeaker 38 Oh, you have my report from the Association of State Floodplain Managers. I'm sure you would love to have an interesting read of the 26 pages of all of the classes that I attended.
0:03:06 — open the recording at 3 minutes 6 secondsSpeaker 40 But that's there if you are interested in it at all. Okay.
0:03:11 — open the recording at 3 minutes 11 secondsSpeaker 41 All right. How about Jennifer?
0:03:17 — open the recording at 3 minutes 17 secondsSpeaker 42 (staff (financial report)) Of course, my report is pretty much self-explanatory. where I just needed to add an updated total for the final July total came to $8,245. So we have a nice little nest egg getting built up.
0:03:34 — open the recording at 3 minutes 34 secondsSpeaker 46 (presiding officer (entertains motions, calls votes)) Great. Okay. Any questions from anyone on the Planning Commission for any of our staff? And I'll entertain a motion.
0:03:46 — open the recording at 3 minutes 46 secondsSpeaker 50 Second.
0:03:47 — open the recording at 3 minutes 47 secondsSpeaker 26 (presiding officer (entertains motions, calls votes)) Those in favor? Aye. Motion passes.
0:03:51 — open the recording at 3 minutes 51 secondsSpeaker 3 (chair (President)) So we'll move to the first item on our agenda.
0:04:00 — open the recording at 4 minutesSpeaker 25 (presiding officer (entertains motions, calls votes)) Or no, we have a committee report and that's just for our use. We don't need any action on that, right? You got a docket number, 4,500 committee reports. That was a Plack Committee report. It's in your file, but we don't need any action on it.
0:04:18 — open the recording at 4 minutes 18 secondsSpeaker 3 (chair (President)) Correct. Thank you. So the first item under old business, city rezoning is docket number 56, special ordinance number 7, 2026, 335 Kent Avenue from an R1 to an R2, two-family residence district.
0:04:35 — open the recording at 4 minutes 35 secondsSpeaker 55 (staff) The property owner is Benjamin Evanger. Proposed use is a duplex development. Proposed zoning is R2, two-family residence district. The current zoning is R1, single-family residence district. The common address is 335 Kent Avenue in Terre Haute. To the north, east, and south are all R1, and there is R2 to the west. The petitioner states he intends to divide the property into two lots for construction of a duplex on the south side of the property, consisting of two dwelling units, each containing two bedrooms and two bathrooms.
0:05:08 — open the recording at 5 minutes 8 secondsSpeaker 55 (staff) A subdivision may be required. Hard surface parking will be required for the future duplex. The property was granted a special use for a sober living facility for the existing home at 335 Kent. The petitioner has stated he does not intend to pursue a special use for the new structure. An approved parking plan was required for the special use for the existing building. In their recommendation, the Department of Engineering states the intended use would not directly alter the neighborhood's characteristic or possibly create significant problems for the surrounding area.
0:05:39 — open the recording at 5 minutes 39 secondsSpeaker 55 (staff) The Department of Engineering provided a favorable recommendation.
0:05:41 — open the recording at 5 minutes 41 secondsSpeaker 57 Staff also provided a favorable recommendation with submission approval of the subdivision if it is required.
0:05:49 — open the recording at 5 minutes 49 secondsSpeaker 59 (commission officer (invites petitioner remarks and commission questions)) The petitioner is present. Yes. Anything you'd like to add to staff's report? No. Okay. Any questions for the petitioner from anyone on the Planning Commission?
0:06:00 — open the recording at 6 minutesSpeaker 61 (petitioner (docket 56 — 335 Kent Avenue)) Yes.
0:06:01 — open the recording at 6 minutes 1 secondSpeaker 60 What soberly new facility was that?
0:06:03 — open the recording at 6 minutes 3 secondsSpeaker 61 (petitioner (docket 56 — 335 Kent Avenue)) Brightwing. The name of it is Brightwing.
0:06:05 — open the recording at 6 minutes 5 secondsSpeaker 63 And it looks like the house directly to the one side of it already is a duplex, right?
0:06:13 — open the recording at 6 minutes 13 secondsSpeaker 64 Directly to the north, correct.
0:06:15 — open the recording at 6 minutes 15 secondsSpeaker 63 And then there's a large lot?
0:06:18 — open the recording at 6 minutes 18 secondsSpeaker 64 There's a large lot, yeah. The one to the north, I'm not sure if it is zoned for R2, but it is a duplex.
0:06:27 — open the recording at 6 minutes 27 secondsSpeaker 67 And then directly across the street is all zoned R2.
0:06:32 — open the recording at 6 minutes 32 secondsSpeaker 68 Oh, okay. Yeah, I see the other two. Okay.
0:06:38 — open the recording at 6 minutes 38 secondsSpeaker 3 (chair (President)) Any other questions from anyone on the Plank Commission?
0:06:43 — open the recording at 6 minutes 43 secondsSpeaker 25 (presiding officer (entertains motions, calls votes)) Anyone else here that would like to speak to this issue? If not, I'll entertain a motion.
0:06:49 — open the recording at 6 minutes 49 secondsSpeaker 72 Motion to agree.
0:06:51 — open the recording at 6 minutes 51 secondsSpeaker 25 (presiding officer (entertains motions, calls votes)) Second. Those in favor? Aye. Motion passes.
0:06:55 — open the recording at 6 minutes 55 seconds Thanks.
0:06:56 — open the recording at 6 minutes 56 secondsSpeaker 3 (chair (President)) Next item under new business, city rezonings docket number 61, special ordinance number 9-2026-908 South 7th Street from an R2 to an R1 single-family residence district.
0:07:13 — open the recording at 7 minutes 13 secondsSpeaker 55 (staff) The property owners are Timothy and Margaret Herdlick. The proposed use is a single-family home. The proposed zoning is R1 single-family residence district. The current zoning is R2 two-family residence district. It's commonly known as 908 South 7th Street. It is in the historic district it has r2 to the north east and south and r2 and r2 plan development to the west the petitioner is is requesting to rezone the property from r2 to r1 single family residence district r2 is the original zoning in this area the home is to remain a single family home with
0:07:47 — open the recording at 7 minutes 47 secondsSpeaker 55 (staff) no change in use the property meets minimum lot size requirements in their recommendation the department of engineering states the intended use would not directly alter the neighborhood's characteristic or possibly create significant problems for the surrounding area this would require an interior and rear setback variance from the Board of Zoning Appeals for the north building line and for the garage on the south and alley by rezoning the property loses its legal non-conforming status and requires variances from city code the Department of Engineering provided a
0:08:13 — open the recording at 8 minutes 13 secondsSpeaker 55 (staff) positive recommendation staff also offers a favorable recommendation with the condition of BZA approval for the necessary variances is the petitioner
0:08:22 — open the recording at 8 minutes 22 secondsSpeaker 6 Mr. President, anyone here speaking to this, representing this petition? No one here that you recognize?
0:08:32 — open the recording at 8 minutes 32 secondsSpeaker 79 No, she's not here, which is kind of surprising.
0:08:35 — open the recording at 8 minutes 35 secondsSpeaker 83 Motion in favor? Second.
0:08:39 — open the recording at 8 minutes 39 secondsSpeaker 82 Those in favor? Aye. Motion is taken.
0:08:48 — open the recording at 8 minutes 48 secondsSpeaker 3 (chair (President)) Next item under new business, city rezoning is docket number 65, special ordinance number 10-2026-2215 Garfield Avenue from an R1 to C1 neighborhood commercial district.
0:09:00 — open the recording at 9 minutesSpeaker 55 (staff) Property owner is St. Properties slash Paul Gibson. Proposed use is corporate office, including digital software development, online software demonstrations, and administrative operations. Proposed zoning is C1 neighborhood commerce district. Current zoning is R1 single Family Residence District. The common address is 2215 Garfield Avenue. It is in a neighborhood enhancement area. To the north is R1, east C2, south R1, and west R3 planned unit development. The property owner is requesting to rezone two parcels to C1 neighborhood commerce district for
0:09:36 — open the recording at 9 minutes 36 secondsSpeaker 55 (staff) a corporate office including digital software development, online software demonstrations, and administrative operations. Although it was zoned R1, the property was previously owned by 12 points lodge number 769 and was legal non-conforming it was not used as a residential property hard surface parking already exists on the property the area is a mixed use of residential and commercial properties the area in the recommendation the Department of Engineering states the intended use would not directly alter the neighborhood's characteristic or
0:10:02 — open the recording at 10 minutes 2 secondsSpeaker 55 (staff) possibly create significant problems for the surrounding area the parcel has adequate off-speed off-street parking and may require state design release for change of use and city plan review and permits for the remodel of the space The Department of Engineering provided a positive recommendation. Staff also provides a favorable recommendation with city plan review and state design release if required.
0:10:22 — open the recording at 10 minutes 22 secondsSpeaker 89 The petitioner is present.
0:10:24 — open the recording at 10 minutes 24 secondsSpeaker 91 (petitioner representative (docket 65 — 2215 Garfield Ave)) Yes. Nothing to add. She read it fast and wonderfully. I'm glad she did it, not myself. I'm glad she did it, too.
0:10:31 — open the recording at 10 minutes 31 secondsSpeaker 59 (commission officer (invites petitioner remarks and commission questions)) Me, too.
0:10:32 — open the recording at 10 minutes 32 secondsSpeaker 25 (presiding officer (entertains motions, calls votes)) Any questions from the petitioner or from the plan commission members? Anyone else here that would like to speak to this issue? Not all entertain a motion. Those in favor? Aye. Motion passes.
0:10:45 — open the recording at 10 minutes 45 secondsSpeaker 49 Thank you.
0:10:51 — open the recording at 10 minutes 51 secondsSpeaker 3 (chair (President)) Next item under new business subdivisions, minor, primary, secondary, docket number 60, file number 38, 2026. Let's go with Cove.
0:11:00 — open the recording at 11 minutesSpeaker 27 (staff (property description)) The property has a frontage on the East Coast Drive and is commonly associated with 6875 East Coast Drive, the one new lot of 2.2 acres to surveyors Mr. Tolles.
0:11:09 — open the recording at 11 minutes 9 secondsSpeaker 28 (staff) The applicant is requesting to subdivide 2.2 acres to separate the existing residential dwelling from the surrounding acreage. Health Department has approved. Public sewer is not available. Public water is available. It's not in the flood zone, and the lot exceeds the minimum lot size requirement. Gross is considered a secondary collector-level roadway at this location, and stormwater drainage should not be required with the minor subdivision. Approval of the plant is contingent upon it being recorded in 90 days.
0:11:35 — open the recording at 11 minutes 35 secondsSpeaker 28 (staff) Staff is of the opinion that addition of a new residence at this location would not serve to overburden the local infrastructure.
0:11:40 — open the recording at 11 minutes 40 secondsSpeaker 101 Few, if any, other concerns exist with this request. We offered a favorable recommendation.
0:11:45 — open the recording at 11 minutes 45 secondsSpeaker 59 (commission officer (invites petitioner remarks and commission questions)) Are you representing this, Matt? Anything you'd like to add? Okay. Any questions?
0:11:53 — open the recording at 11 minutes 53 secondsSpeaker 25 (presiding officer (entertains motions, calls votes)) Anyone here speaking to this issue? No.
0:11:57 — open the recording at 11 minutes 57 secondsSpeaker 103 Those in favor?
0:12:00 — open the recording at 12 minutesSpeaker 3 (chair (President)) Aye. Motion passes. Next item under new business subdivisions minor primary secondary docket number 63 file number 40 2026 not.
0:12:12 — open the recording at 12 minutes 12 secondsSpeaker 27 (staff (property description)) The property has furniture on East State Road 246 and is commonly associated with 71 50 East State Road 246.
0:12:20 — open the recording at 12 minutes 20 secondsSpeaker 28 (staff) One new lot of 21.63 acres. Surveyors Mr. Wagner. The applicant is requesting subdivide and replat parts of the Callens sub creating one new lot for all of the structures surrounding the original homestead. The Health Department has approved, as public sewer is not available, public water is not available, it's not in a flood zone, the lot exceeds the minimum lot size requirement. East State Road 246 is a rural arterial roadway at this location, and stormwater drainage will not be required with the minor subdivision. Approval of the plan is contingent upon it being recorded in 90 days.
0:12:54 — open the recording at 12 minutes 54 secondsSpeaker 28 (staff) A variance of scale has been requested due to the large area involved. Staff said the opinion that the requested variance will not be injurious to the public health, safety, morals, convenience, or general welfare of the community. The value of the area adjacent to the property included in the variance will not be affected in a substantially adverse manner. The strict applications of the terms of this ordinance have resulted in an unnecessary hardship, excluding financial reasons, in the use of the property. Therefore, staff recommends favorably on the variance request.
0:13:20 — open the recording at 13 minutes 20 secondsSpeaker 28 (staff) And few, if any, other concerns exist with this subdivision request.
0:13:23 — open the recording at 13 minutes 23 secondsSpeaker 107 (staff) So we offer favorable on, of course, the variance, as well as the subdivision itself.
0:13:28 — open the recording at 13 minutes 28 secondsSpeaker 78 Is the petitioner present?
0:13:31 — open the recording at 13 minutes 31 seconds I represent.
0:13:33 — open the recording at 13 minutes 33 secondsSpeaker 78 Anything you need to add to staff's report? Okay.
0:13:36 — open the recording at 13 minutes 36 secondsSpeaker 25 (presiding officer (entertains motions, calls votes)) Any questions? Anyone can find this you might have. Anyone here would like to speak to this issue? Not all entertain a motion.
0:13:45 — open the recording at 13 minutes 45 secondsSpeaker 111 Those in favor?
0:13:47 — open the recording at 13 minutes 47 secondsSpeaker 25 (presiding officer (entertains motions, calls votes)) Aye. Motion passes.
0:13:52 — open the recording at 13 minutes 52 secondsSpeaker 3 (chair (President)) Next item under new business subdivisions,
0:13:55 — open the recording at 13 minutes 55 secondsSpeaker 112 subdivisions major primary secondary docket number 59 file number 37 2026 gr
0:14:02 — open the recording at 14 minutes 2 secondsSpeaker 27 (staff (property description)) McGuire phase 2 the property is commonly associated with 3,800 North
0:14:07 — open the recording at 14 minutes 7 secondsSpeaker 28 (staff) fruitridge Avenue 12.85 acres surveyors mr. tolls and the request is to subdivide the parent tract creating two new lots lot 2a will contain the existing commercial building health department has approved sanitary sewers available public water is available portions are in a flood zone the lots do exceed the minimum lot size requirement storm water drainage may be required with the subdivision the plant separates the metal building from the remaining acreage the property is currently zoned c5 which is correct for the current commercial use sufficient utilities are available to support future
0:14:42 — open the recording at 14 minutes 42 secondsSpeaker 28 (staff) commercial development at this location portions of lot 2a and 2b are in a fema identified special flood hazard area the plat shows an incorrect FEMA firm number as well as indicates that there are zones ae depicted on the plat these will need to be changed there was a letter of map revision or lomar in 2011 altering portions of the map sections from the flood zone ae to zone x depending on terro's flood ordinance there may be requirements for construction in that 0.2 percent annual chance fringe we offered favorable in the primary and secondary with
0:15:17 — open the recording at 15 minutes 17 secondsSpeaker 28 (staff) with the drainage and erosion control plan approval for any new development, correction of the flood information on the plan, planning for infrastructure if needed, and record within 90 days.
0:15:28 — open the recording at 15 minutes 28 secondsSpeaker 117 Matt, anything you'd like to add to this? Okay, any questions for Matt about the whole seven years?
0:15:35 — open the recording at 15 minutes 35 secondsSpeaker 25 (presiding officer (entertains motions, calls votes)) Anyone else here who would like to speak to this issue? Now I'll entertain a motion.
0:15:40 — open the recording at 15 minutes 40 secondsSpeaker 50 Motion approved.
0:15:41 — open the recording at 15 minutes 41 secondsSpeaker 25 (presiding officer (entertains motions, calls votes)) Second. Those in favor? Aye. Motion passes.
0:15:47 — open the recording at 15 minutes 47 secondsSpeaker 3 (chair (President)) Next item under new business subdivisions major primary secondary docket number 62 file number 39-2026 HMM Holdings LLC.
0:16:00 — open the recording at 16 minutesSpeaker 28 (staff) So this property has frontage along Blakely Avenue. It is commonly associated with 4101 Wabash Avenue. The size is five acres. The surveyors Mr. Wagner. The request is to subdivide one new lot for a commercial building. Health Department is approved. Sanitary sewer is available. Public water is available. It's not in a flood zone. The lots do exceed the minimum lot size requirement, and there will be no new proposed public streets. Stormwater drainage may be required with this major subdivision. The property is currently zoned C2, Community Commerce District,
0:16:33 — open the recording at 16 minutes 33 secondsSpeaker 28 (staff) and is to the south of Union Hospital Professional Plaza. So infrastructure is in place, and capacity exists to support this development. Rezoning may be required, depending on the nature of the commercial use. The signature page on the plat and the application need to be amended to reflect the deeded owner. I think that may have been done already. That is correct. Okay, thank you. So approval of the plat contingent of course being recorded within 90 days. We offered favorable on the primary and secondary approval with drainage and erosion control plan for the new site prior to permitting.
0:17:05 — open the recording at 17 minutes 5 secondsSpeaker 28 (staff) Some minor plat changes, which I think we have addressed.
0:17:08 — open the recording at 17 minutes 8 secondsSpeaker 107 (staff) Bonding for infrastructure if needed, fire department approval, and of course the recording within 90 days.
0:17:14 — open the recording at 17 minutes 14 secondsSpeaker 129 (petitioner representative (docket 62 — H&M Holdings)) I'm also here with Steve Templeton Sr. on behalf of H&M Holdings and Seth Porter with Handing Construction. Happy to answer the question. Okay.
0:17:29 — open the recording at 17 minutes 29 secondsSpeaker 48 Any questions for anybody from the planning session? Anyone here speaking to this issue?
0:17:36 — open the recording at 17 minutes 36 secondsSpeaker 25 (presiding officer (entertains motions, calls votes)) Now I'll entertain a motion.
0:17:39 — open the recording at 17 minutes 39 secondsSpeaker 133 (presiding officer (entertains motions, calls votes)) Second. Those in favor? Aye. Motion passes. Aye. Motion passes. Thank you.
0:17:52 — open the recording at 17 minutes 52 secondsSpeaker 3 (chair (President)) Next item under new business subdivisions, major, primary, secondary, docket number 64, file number 41, 2026, Riverside Development.
0:18:03 — open the recording at 18 minutes 3 secondsSpeaker 27 (staff (property description)) The property has a common address at 2403 South Riverside Road and is the location of the outdoor venue called the Mill.
0:18:10 — open the recording at 18 minutes 10 secondsSpeaker 28 (staff) It's 20.195 acres, the surveyors, Mr. Tolles. The request is to subdivide a portion of the property owned by the Vigo County Community Development Corporation for commercial use. The Health Department has approved a sanitary sewer is available, public water is available. It's not in a flood zone and the lot does exceed the minimum lot size requirement. There are no new proposed public streets with this, and stormwater drainage may be required prior to any new development. development. Adequate infrastructure is available for future use and development, given the large
0:18:40 — open the recording at 18 minutes 40 secondsSpeaker 28 (staff) lot size future division of the property may be requested. The property is currently zoned M2 Heavy Industrial, so any commercial uses at this location will require a rezoning of the property. We offered a favorable in the primary and secondary with a road cut permit if needed, drain engine erosion control plan approval prior to the permitting, bonding for infrastructure if needed, fire department approval prior to permitting, and then recorded within 90
0:19:04 — open the recording at 19 minutes 4 secondsSpeaker 101 Mr. Mr. Felling.
0:19:06 — open the recording at 19 minutes 6 secondsSpeaker 137 (unknown — contaminated cluster) Mr. Mr. President, how are you? The Press Press. Mr. I'm good. How about yourself? Mr. I'm well. I'll keep it simple.
0:19:12 — open the recording at 19 minutes 12 secondsSpeaker 138 (petitioner representative (docket 64 — Riverside Development / the Mill, on behalf of Tim Drake)) This is really just a housekeeping issue. Nothing is going to change with regard to the operation at the mill. Actually, I'm here on behalf of Tim Drake. We're hoping to continue that operation and have another successful, I know they've had a good year so far, another successful year for the years to come. So, we'd ask for your approval this evening. I'm happy to answer any questions. The Press Press.
0:19:30 — open the recording at 19 minutes 30 secondsSpeaker 59 (commission officer (invites petitioner remarks and commission questions)) Okay. Any questions from anyone on the Planning Commission? Anyone else here to speak to this issue? No.
0:19:38 — open the recording at 19 minutes 38 secondsSpeaker 141 Go ahead.
0:19:46 — open the recording at 19 minutes 46 secondsSpeaker 145 You better stay.
0:19:48 — open the recording at 19 minutes 48 secondsSpeaker 144 (presiding officer (recusal vote, docket 64)) Move. Would somebody need to make a motion to them to recuse themselves?
0:19:51 — open the recording at 19 minutes 51 secondsSpeaker 146 So move. Exactly.
0:19:53 — open the recording at 19 minutes 53 secondsSpeaker 144 (presiding officer (recusal vote, docket 64)) Do those in favor? Aye.
0:19:55 — open the recording at 19 minutes 55 secondsSpeaker 147 (presiding officer (recusal vote, docket 64)) Do you all recuse? Thank you. Yeah. Executed?
0:19:58 — open the recording at 19 minutes 58 secondsSpeaker 149 Now I'll entertain a motion on the...
0:20:01 — open the recording at 20 minutes 1 secondSpeaker 154 We got a motion for approval. Do you have a second?
0:20:09 — open the recording at 20 minutes 9 secondsSpeaker 156 (commission member) She made a motion. Just saying it. Second. Okay.
0:20:13 — open the recording at 20 minutes 13 secondsSpeaker 147 (presiding officer (recusal vote, docket 64)) Those in favor? All right. Motion passes after all that.
0:20:17 — open the recording at 20 minutes 17 secondsSpeaker 158 Thank you.
0:20:19 — open the recording at 20 minutes 19 secondsSpeaker 160 I think Jared said that the last item had been withdrawn, so no action necessary. Correct. Okay.
0:20:25 — open the recording at 20 minutes 25 secondsSpeaker 163 Motion to adjourn.
0:20:28 — open the recording at 20 minutes 28 seconds Second.
0:20:29 — open the recording at 20 minutes 29 secondsSpeaker 163 Yeah. Those in favor?
0:20:32 — open the recording at 20 minutes 32 secondsSpeaker 164 Aye. We are adjourned.
0:20:59 — open the recording at 20 minutes 59 secondsSpeaker 174 See you next time.
Marked moments above are where the archive's reviewed highlights were drawn from. Everything else on this page is unreviewed.